Krasnokutskiy Pavel Anatol'evich, Сandidate of economic sciences, associate professor, sub-department of world economy and international economic relations, Don State Technical University (1 Gagarina square, Rostov-on-Don, Russia), E-mail: email@example.com
Zmiyak Sergey Sergeevich, Doctor of economic sciences, associate professor, head of sub-department of world economy and international economic relations, Don State Technical University (1 Gagarina square, Rostov-on-Don, Russia), E-mail: Sergey_zm@list.ru
Volodina Nadezhda Viktorovna, Deputy head of department of investigations, Financial Monitoring Office, Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia (11 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya street, Moscow, Russia), E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Background. The aim of the study is to justify the effectiveness of implementing the strategy of inclusive growth as a tool for reducing the differentiation of the level of development of regions.
Materials and methods. The methodology of the study is based on a comparison of indicators included in the index of inclusive development with parameters that determine economic security. On this basis, the conclusion is drawn that the implementation of the strategy of inclusive growth contributes not only to reducing the degree of heterogeneity of territorial development, but also to ensuring economic security.
Results. In the work on the basis of extensive statistical material, the regions of Southern Federal District are compared by GRP per capita, life expectancy at birth, unemployment rate, demographic load factor, population with incomes below the subsistence minimum, Gini coefficient, decile coefficient and other parameters.
Conclusions. Conclusions are drawn about the high level of differentiation in the development of territories within the borders of one federal district. The necessity of inclusion of the concept of inclusive growth with the documents defining perspective directions of development at the national and regional level is justified.
1. Gorbunova S. I., Knyaz'kina E. O., Kremcheeva A. Z., Kormishkin E. D. Sistemnoe upravlenie [System management]. No. 2 (3), pp. 13–21.
2. Mironova O. A. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta (RINKh) [Bulletin of Rostov State Economic University]. 2018, no. 1 (61), pp. 110–119.
3. Lipatova L. N., Gradusova V. N., Modin E. V. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Managerial consulting]. 2016, no. 5 (89), pp. 102–111.
4. Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/ec-understanding-era-13.pdf.
5. The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2018. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive-development-index-2018.
6. The Inclusive Growth and Development Report 2017. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-inclusive-growth-and-development-report-2017.
7. Pokazateli dlya monitoringa otsenki effektivnosti deyatel'nosti sub"ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Indicators for monitoring the performance efficiency of subjects of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/rosstat/pok-monitor/pok-monitor.html.
8. Sotsial'noe polozhenie i uroven' zhizni naseleniya Rossii v 2017 g. (informatsiya po sub"ektam Rossiyskoy Federatsii) [Social status and living standards of the population of Russia in 2017 (data bu regions of the Russian Federation)]. Moscow: Rosstat, 2017, 332 p.
9. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Yuzhnogo federal'nogo okruga v 2017 godu [Socioeconomic status of Souther Federal District in 2017]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_114